the not doing of evil is an affirmative action, for he that doth refrain from evil actions, it is counted a good action in the sight of God, and of righteous men.
Lodowicke Muggleton: [Letter to Mr. Capp, upon his death-bed, dated from London, the 15th of March, 1683], in: John Reeve und Lodowicke Muggleton: A Volume of Spiritual Epistles. Being the Copies of Several Letters Written by the Two Last Prophets and Messengers of God, 1755, S. 526-529, hier S. 527.
If the right should be of any probable value, it would be the duty of the assignee to take affirmative action to sustain it, and make it available for the benefit of the creditors.
Anonymus: Recent American decisions in the Supreme Court of New York, King’s County, Sept. 1858. Charles Cleveland against William Boerum and Others, in: The American Law Register 7 (1859), S. 144-158, hier S. 147.
in the case of irrational private discrimination in employment, legislation can be drafted to meet a need for affirmative action.
Louis Lusky: Minority rights and the public interest, in: The Yale Law Journal 52 (1942), S. 1-41, hier S. 41.
It seems clear that neither existing legislation nor the common law present any obstacle to defamers of groups. Since there is little likelihood that the courts will change their present attitude affirmative action if warranted must come through new legislation.
Anonymus: Statutory prohibition of group defamation, in: Columbia Law Review 47 (1947), S. 595-613, hier S. 602.
In a paper presented at the Chicago Colloquium, Mr. Ernest Angell said: “The original, primary concern of the Rule with protection of fundamental rights against encroachment by the state has broadened to include rights or privileges based on affirmative action by the state to provide equal opportunity in public services such as education, public housing, etc.; and to protect against encroachments by other individuals or groups.”
Arthur L. Goodhart: The rule of law and absolute sovereignty, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review 106 (1958), S. 943-963, hier S. 945.
Before Bakke, higher education did not have a clear framework for afﬁrmative action, relying largely on an employment model for considering race/ethnicity in college admissions. With the 1978 decision, the Supreme Court provided speciﬁc guidelines for university admissions policies, both narrowing (through the ﬁnding that quotas were illegal) and expanding (by allowing race/ethnicity to be included as part of holistic review) how race/ethnicity could be considered.
Catherine L. Horn und Patricia Marin: Realizing the legacy of Bakke, in: Patricia Marin und Catherine L. Horn (Hg.): Realizing Bakke’s Legacy. Afﬁrmative Action, Equal Opportunity, and Access to Higher Education, Stirling, Virg. 2008, S. 1-11, hier S. 6.
Nijole V. Benokraitis und Joe R. Feagin: Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity. Action, Inaction, Reaction, New York 1978.
James A. Beckman: Affirmative Action. An Encyclopedia, Westport, Conn. 2004.
Patricia Marin und Catherine L. Horn (Hg.): Realizing Bakke’s Legacy. Afﬁrmative Action, Equal Opportunity, and Access to Higher Education, Stirling, Virg. 2008.
William M. Leiter: Affirmative Action in Antidiscrimination Law and Policy. An Overview and Synthesis, Albany 2002, 2. Aufl. 2011.
Moises F. Salinas: The Politics of Stereotype. Pychology and Affirmative Action, Westport, Conn. 2003.
Edmund Terence Gomez: Affirmative Action, Ethnicity, and Conflict, London 2013.
James A. Beckman: Controversies in Affirmative Action, 3 Bde., Santa Barbara 2014.
Sigal Alon: Race, Class, and Affirmative Action, New York 2015.
Michele S. Moses: Living with Moral Ddisagreement. The Enduring Controversy about Affirmative Action, Chicago 2016.
M. Kelly Carr: The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity. Supreme Court Opinions, Public Argument, and Affirmative Action, East Lansing 2018.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen: Making Sense of Affirmative Action, New York 2020.